tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32582789.post2308133589905935474..comments2023-10-20T05:12:43.292-04:00Comments on Blue Bexley: Clarificationbonobohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08241279987882052237noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32582789.post-21253489085064880972008-05-07T11:31:00.000-04:002008-05-07T11:31:00.000-04:00Great post!The one thing I'd differ with you on is...Great post!<BR/><BR/>The one thing I'd differ with you on is in your last paragraph where you indicate that Schultz is identifying the affair as a basis for impeachment, and you disagree. She doesn't actually bring up impeachment in the column She only talks about Dann's career being over -- I think she may be referring just to him being pressured to resign, not to impeachment.<BR/><BR/>Nevertheless, I agree with you (here and in your earlier post) that impeaching him just for the affair is a poor idea, even though the affair is reprehensible and Schultz makes good points about the power imbalance and the unfairness to Utovich. However, in fact there appears to be a lot more malfeasance here than just the affair, or even the affair and covering up the affair.<BR/><BR/>- JeffAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com