Thursday, October 19, 2006

American Dreams

Neither of the candidates that I spend most of my time writing about are campaigning on anything like "The American Dream" as a theme. It's difficult to do so nowadays without sounding cheesy and insincere anyway. But even though Bob Shamansky and Emily Kreider are from very different generations and very different tax brackets, I was recently very struck by the parallels in the stories they tell of how their families came to Central Ohio, and how that influences what they do now.

In an oral history recorded for the Columbus Jewish Historical Society in 1993, Bob Shamansky describes the migrations of his parents' families:

"With respect to my personal history, I was born on April 18, 1927. My parents were living at 525 South Drexel Avenue in Bexley, Ohio. I was the younger son. My brother, Samuel C. Shamansky is 4 ½ years older than I.

My mother’s name was Sarah Greenberg, her father was Samuel Greenberg and her mother was Rebecca Greenberg. They came from Russia somewhere between Zhitomir and Berditchev which is west of Kiev. My mother was born in Russia but my maternal grandfather came to this country in the 1890s and I’m sure he originally came as a peddler. I don’t know whether he had a pushcart but he was a peddler and I was told that they were so poor, of course, that they lived in the "red light district" because that was the only place they could afford. That was Spring Street over by the prison and by the railroad station. They got off the train and found the cheapest place to live.

The interesting parallel to that is, my father was born in Manchester, England. My paternal grandparents were Michael Shamansky and his wife, Rachel whose maiden name had been Clayman. They were married, I believe, in Riga, which was the Russian empire but was in Latvia. They went to Manchester, England first, in 1892 where my father was born. He was the eldest of the surviving children. In 1981, I went to Manchester, England to look up his birth record. I thought he was born in 1895 but in fact, he was born in 1892 and when I went to the registry office in Manchester, I obviously have a Jewish name . . there’s a Jewish section of the library in Manchester. The public library in Manchester has a Jewish historical section.

At the registry, when I gave my name and they looked up my father’s birth record which was 1892, he was listed as being born in Cheatham and that was where the Jewish immigrants were living at the time, having come from Russia.

I then went to the Manchester Public Library to look up the history of Cheatham, got a map and . . . lo and behold! of course, it was behind a prison near the railroad station. Whether my paternal grandparents came from Riga to Manchester, that’s where they ended up living, obviously the poorest part of town where immigrants could come. That was my maternal grandparents experience in Columbus, having come directly from Russia, as far as I know."


There's no more railroad station or prison near Spring and 3rd, and it's not a "red-light" district anymore. But there is still plenty of segregation between haves and have-nots in Central Ohio. Mr. Shamansky and I are fortunate enough to reside in Bexley, a 'desirable' suburban island surrounded by Columbus's east side. There is another 'suburban' island on the east-side, called Whitehall. According to the 2000 census, the median family income in Franklin County was $53905, in Bexley it was $83363, and in Whitehall, it was $37296. In her recent interview with Meet the Bloggers, Emily made a wistful sounding joke that I don't think the panel of bloggers really got, not being from around here. When asked if she was born and bred in the district, she replied:

"I was born in Phoenix, Arizona, but for most of my life I've lived in Central Ohio. I grew up on the East Side, in Whitehall, and graduated from Whitehall-Yearling. I arrived in Columbus via Greyhound Bus, (pause) just down the street from the Statehouse (laughs)."

The Greyhound Station is literally a 1000 feet from the Statehouse, but if you've been in both, you know the figurative distance is light-years. The shortest path definitely doesn't take you through Whitehall. It'll have taken her decades to travel those three blocks, but in less than three weeks from now, she'll have done it.

Republicans try to sell you something they call the American dream. Democrats embody it.

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

Talk about a pile of horseshit. Not the life stories of Krieder and Shamansky, but that last paragraph of yours. It's good to see two people succeed after starting with humble beginnings. But your notion that all Republicans are born with silver spoons or that the rich in their mouth sounds like something that a high schooler with no clue would say. There is a good number of GOP legislators in Columbus (and across the country) that come from poor beginnings, and are very successful in life. Liberals don't have a monopoly on that.

bonobo said...

I'm sorry that you took my final sentence that way, although I can see why you might infer that's what I meant. The point is not that Republicans are always dishonest when they push a rags-to-riches theme, the point was that many Democrats who could tell these stories, don't. The primary difference I perceive is that Conservatives tend to view their successes as predominantly being the just rewards of their own hard work and wise choices. By implication, anyone who is not successful is either lazy or foolish, possibly both. Thus, the American Dream motif becomes a character judgment, and taking pride in embodying it is a testament to one's own moral worth. Hence the attacks on the welfare queens and the liberal elite coming out of either side of the Republican noise machine. Liberals don't tend to take such a presumptuous position.

Now, does everyone and her favorite uncle know that John Edwards was the son of a mill-worker? Sure. Has Barack Obama given American Dream-themed speeches? Yup. We could argue whether or not it's the same thing, but I'll concede the point. Was my categorical and hyperbolic final sentence lacking in nuance? Guilty as charged. Perhaps the right pile, but the wrong horseshit. It's too bad if what we both essentially recognize as a throwaway line detracted too much from the stories, but live and learn I guess. Thanks for engaging.

P.S., It's not just you, my dear anonymous, but I'd appreciate it if people in general stop using the 'anonymous' identity choice if they plan to say something with any substance here in the comments. The last time this happened there were at least 3 different anonymae and it made discourse quite difficult. I don't need your real name. Choosing 'Other' and calling yourself "Anonymous-1" would be fine by me.

Anonymous said...

Isn't success a reward for hard work and good decisions? I believe that it is. I also believe, like most conservatives, that every American has the chance to be a success in life and whatever they do. The question is, what do you need to do in order to be successful? Some people don't do what it takes to become successful and if they do not, whose fault is that?

bonobo said...

P.O., If life was fair, success would be a reward for hard work and good decisions. And it's true that the only way to really pursue success is to work hard and make the best decisions you can. But face it, life's not fair. This upward class mobility is the exception rather than the norm. Children of upper middle class parents are going to be upper middle class themselves unless they make an almost intentional effort to not work and make bad decisions. Likewise, kids raised in poverty are a whole lot more likely to end up as poor adults.

It's not supposed to be that way in America. So why is it?

1) The inequities in our school system are a disgrace. None of it is the fault of the kids. And I'm sick of hearing that the parents just need to get more involved. Many of the ones who really care find a way to get their kids out of the district, leaving only the most disadvantaged to try and take on the extra work of reforming their schools.

2) The intergenerational transfer of resources creates a de facto aristocracy. It's a huge inefficiency in the marketplace, as capital flows to people lucky enough to be born into wealth, rather than people industrious or smart enough to earn or create it. The attacks on the estate tax are probably the most immoral and unAmerican position the tax hawks take. Sure, I want to give my daughter every advantage, but that doesn't mean she has some inherent right to privilege that a girl living a mile west of me doesn't have.

3) Segments of our society are explicitly trying to limit the acceptable contributions of women to society, and implicitly creating self-fulfilling prophecies about the contributions that can be made by people of differing racial and ethnic backgrounds.

4) This "everybody has a chance" thing is really disingenuous. There have been gambling teams that did careful observations of individual roulette wheels. On a correctly functioning roulette wheel, a given number will come up on 1 out of every 37 spins (2.7% of the time). By determining which spots actually came up 1 out of 33 times (3.0% of the time), they beat the house for millions. It doesn't take much of an advantage before your chance is a whole lot better than mine.

Life's not fair. Pretending that it is doesn't make it so. People will often take credit for things they only believe that they've earned, every bit as much as people will cast blame on others for their own very real shortcomings. As I said, I think your simplistic take is presumptuous.

Anonymous said...

I'm not sure whether reading these comments makes me incredibly sad or filled with righteous indignation.

Many years ago I survived a broken spine, broken face, severe concussion, and kidney damage from a multi-car pile-up. It has taken thirty seven surgeries and cumulative years in hospitals to put me back together again only to be diagnosed with breast cancer later. Through it all I was expected to be a single mom and a wage earner - with no family or support at all in the area!

Though I have recovered and am now a productive member of my community and have raised two incredible, intelligent, responsible and compassionate sons, there is not a day goes by that I don't suffer extremely painful reminders of that nightmare both physically and emotionally.

However, it gives me the unenviable qualification that few others possess to speak to the challenges we now face as a state and community, be they health care, social safety net, education, jobs, welfare.

I suppose any professional or economic failures that occured during those years would be considered a "moral failure" on my part by these self-righteous conservatives. In fact that is exactly what has happened. The Ohio Republican Party and Rep. Jim McGregor have gone back in history to retrieve a few isolated facts from that tragic time period and venomously distort my life in order to win a few votes and silence my message of hope, compassion, opportunity, shared values and shared responsibilities. Are they really so arrogant as to believe that I didn't fully anticipate these very personal attacks and mudslinging when I decided to get into this race?

Win or lose my message will not be silenced. I will continue to work for those values and against the self righteous moralists...because I know better than most, the real meaning of "there but for the grace of God go I." Thanks for listening, and thanks for your support!

Bev Campbell